Oncology infrastructure
& cost-effectiveness
Evidence-driven planning of oncology services at country and regional level, combining clinical pathways, health economics and implementation constraints.
- Needs assessment and service mapping
- Infrastructure and investment scenarios
- Cost-effectiveness and sensitivity analysis
- Phased implementation roadmaps
Scope and approach
Questions we help answer
- Where are the access gaps and what is the likely patient impact?
- Which investments have the highest impact under budget and workforce constraints?
- Which delivery model fits geography and referral patterns?
- How can implementation be phased with clear milestones and risks?
From diagnosis to palliative care
Our work considers diagnosis, systemic therapy, radiation therapy, surgery and palliative care. Scenarios include capital and operating costs, with cost-effectiveness analysis where appropriate.
Clear, traceable deliverables
We start with scope definition and data triage, then build a short list of decision-relevant scenarios. Assumptions are explicit and traceable. Outputs can include a stakeholder-ready report, slide deck and implementation roadmap.
Work can be delivered as a rapid assessment or a deeper modelling project, depending on needs, timelines and data availability.
Scenario comparison with CancerCompass
Designed to compare local provision, selective local provision and referral using population needs, expected activity, workforce, infrastructure, geography and costs.